Ask → Choose → Interpret → Challenge → Integrate
A clinical-imaging reasoning workspace for oncologists and trainees. It helps formulate the question, interrogate the report and recognize uncertainty. It does not interpret medical images.
Tell radiology what decision depends on the scan
Can this result resolve the clinical question?
Did the report answer the oncology question?
Paste no identifiers. Tick what the report explicitly addresses; the tool generates clarification questions rather than reinterpreting the images.
Keep contradictory evidence visible
Do not force a conclusion when imaging, pathology, examination or trajectory disagree.
Is imaging ready for tumour board?
Why scan — or why not scan?
Reasoning challenges
Select a scenario. Ask yourself first: what is the clinical question, what could the test miss, and what would change management?
Evidence / source registry
Evidence-based imaging appropriateness guidance for referring clinicians and radiologists; reviewed/updated by expert panels.
Open source ↗Appropriate-use decision support at the point of imaging referral.
Open source ↗European evidence-based imaging referral guidance / clinical decision support.
Open source ↗Structured reporting templates and common radiology data elements.
Open source ↗Standardized radiology terminology for reporting and decision support.
Open source ↗Standardized solid-tumour response measurement framework; used only as a reference layer in this preview.
Open source ↗Immune-response trial framework including unconfirmed progression; not automatically substituted for RECIST.
Open source ↗Preview scope: education and clinician decision support. No medical-image analysis, diagnosis, automatic staging or patient-specific modality recommendation is performed. Availability constraints are intentionally separated from the optimal clinical question.