Surgical Oncology

Shared operative concepts, quality context and cross-specialty hand-offs.

v0.1 preview
Context before procedureIntent, disease state and treatment sequence come before the operation name.
International principleOncologic concepts are shared; access, accreditation and resource constraints are localized.
Structured hand-offDesigned to connect Surgery → Pathology → CSCE → adjuvant modules.
This first release is not a procedure recommender. It structures surgical oncology concepts and quality/context data so disease-specific pathways can later use them safely.
RTE:SURG:INTENT

Operative intent

State the intended oncologic purpose before describing the procedure.

Capture
Curative/cytoreductive/diagnostic/palliative intent, planned disease target, multidisciplinary context.
Why it matters
The same operation can mean different things depending on disease state and treatment sequence.
Common trap

Procedure name alone does not define oncologic intent.

RTE:SURG:RESECTABILITY

Resectability

Represent resectability as a context-dependent multidisciplinary assessment, not a permanent tumour property.

Capture
Disease distribution, critical structure involvement, expected morbidity, centre capability, date and reviewer.
Why it matters
Resectability may change with imaging, systemic therapy, expertise and available reconstruction.
Common trap

Do not encode “unresectable” without timepoint, rationale and clinical context.

RTE:SURG:PROCEDURE

Procedure & extent

Record the actual procedure and its anatomical extent separately from the intended procedure.

Capture
Procedure, organs/structures removed, laterality, en-bloc components, conversion or deviation from plan.
Why it matters
Postoperative interpretation depends on what was actually removed and sampled.
Common trap

The scheduled operation is not necessarily the performed operation.

RTE:SURG:MARGIN

Margin strategy & final margin status

Link surgical margin strategy to the pathology-reported named margins without replacing pathology evidence.

Capture
Oriented margins, intraoperative assessment if used, final pathological status and distance where reported.
Why it matters
Margins connect anatomy, surgery, pathology and adjuvant treatment reasoning.
Common trap

A global “clear margin” field is too crude for many tumour sites.

RTE:SURG:RESIDUAL_DISEASE

Residual disease (R0 / R1 / R2 context)

Store the residual-disease assessment with its source and disease context.

Capture
No residual / microscopic / macroscopic residual disease when the applicable oncologic framework uses these categories; source and date.
Why it matters
Residual disease is distinct from an individual specimen margin and can influence prognosis and further therapy.
Common trap

Do not substitute a pathology margin result for the entire operative residual-disease assessment.

RTE:SURG:SENTINEL_NODE

Sentinel-node procedure

Represent mapping, retrieval and pathological evaluation as linked steps rather than one yes/no field.

Capture
Tracer/dye method, mapped basins, nodes removed, laterality, mapping failure, pathology result.
Why it matters
Sentinel-node workflows span surgery, nuclear medicine and pathology.
Common trap

A failed mapping procedure is not a negative sentinel-node result.

RTE:SURG:LYMPHADENECTOMY

Lymphadenectomy / nodal sampling

Capture anatomical basins and extent explicitly.

Capture
Basins/levels, laterality, sampling vs dissection, number removed/examined when available, complications.
Why it matters
“Lymphadenectomy” can represent very different anatomical extents across tumour sites.
Common trap

Do not infer nodal coverage from the procedure label alone.

RTE:SURG:RECONSTRUCTION

Reconstruction

Record reconstructive procedures as part of the oncologic pathway, including structures restored and implications for later treatment.

Capture
Technique, graft/flap/implant, donor site, relevant postoperative constraints.
Why it matters
Reconstruction can change anatomy, imaging interpretation, wound care and radiotherapy planning.
Common trap

Postoperative anatomy should not be assumed to match preoperative Atlas geometry.

RTE:SURG:MORBIDITY

Perioperative morbidity

Capture complications using a defined severity framework and time window when available.

Capture
Complication, severity/grade, date, intervention, readmission/reoperation where applicable.
Why it matters
Outcome and quality frameworks require comparable definitions, not free-text impressions.
Common trap

Do not mix expected postoperative events with complications without a defined framework.

RTE:SURG:QUALITY

Centre expertise & quality context

Keep centre capability and quality indicators separate from the biological recommendation.

Capture
Relevant accreditation, annual volume where required, specialist expertise, resources, referral status.
Why it matters
Complex oncologic surgery may depend on centre organisation and expertise.
Common trap

A regional/resource limitation should be shown as implementation context, not rewritten as biological truth.

RTE:SURG:POSTOP_PATH

Postoperative pathology hand-off

Define the minimum structured hand-off from Surgery to Pathology/CSCE.

Capture
Procedure/specimens, tumour extent, margins, nodal basins, treatment effect, complications and operative findings relevant to classification.
Why it matters
This is the bridge from the operating room to pathological staging and adjuvant reasoning.
Common trap

Do not reconstruct operative anatomy later from a vague narrative if structured fields could have been captured.

RTE:SURG:TIMING

Treatment sequence & timepoint

Record whether surgery is primary, post-neoadjuvant, interval, salvage or recurrence-directed.

Capture
Previous therapy, date, disease timepoint, planned next step.
Why it matters
Interpretation of pathology, response and subsequent treatment depends on sequence.
Common trap

A postoperative finding without treatment context can be misused in pretreatment staging.

Related radioterapie.eu tools

Core sources

ESGO guidelines / consensus / quality indicators — Evidence-based recommendations and quality frameworks for gynaecologic oncology. Source
ESGO accreditation overview — Centre-level quality and organisational standards for complex gynaecologic oncology care. Source
ESGO Endometrial Cancer Surgery accreditation — Example of disease-specific surgical quality indicators and centre accreditation. Source
Version scope: This first release is a shared reference and teaching layer. Tumour-specific diagnostic or treatment rules require their own source-verified clinical package before they become executable guidance.